Example 1: A, an owner, rented his house to B, a commercial sex worker, knowing that it would be used for immoral trade. The landlord can`t get the rent back. Here, the object is immoral, the rent payment agreement is invalid. If the purpose or consideration of an agreement is the execution of an act prohibited by law, the agreement is annulled. Acts or undertakings prohibited by law are punishable by law, as are those prohibited (explicitly or implicitly) by specific legislation of Parliament and state legislators. Example 2: A agrees to leave his daughter as concubine to B. The agreement is subject to nullity because it is immoral, although the rental cannot be punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). Any agreement involving or involving a violation of persons or other property is considered illegal and therefore not a sidekick. The circumstances that would make a consideration illegal and the subject of an agreement are considered as in an illegal agreement under the common law of the treaty, is one that the court will not argue, because the purpose of the agreement is to obtain an unlawful purpose. The illegal purpose must result from the performance of the contract. The classic example of such an agreement is a murder contract. Trade restriction agreements can be implemented if they are appropriate.
If an ex-employee is subject to deference, the court will consider geographic boundaries, what the worker knows and the extent of the length of time. Deference to a business seller must be appropriate and binding where there is a true quality-will label. Under common law, price-fixing contracts are legal. Single delivery agreements (“Solus”) are legal if reasonable. Contracts contrary to public policy are non-issue. Although the purpose or idea of an agreement, sometimes not directly prohibited by law, they are always prohibited when it comes to the nature of destroying the purpose of the provision of the law. The authorization of such an object or such consideration is void. If a decree-law provides for a sanction for an act or promise, the execution of such an act or promise would amount to the defeat of that law, because it is implied that the statute intends to prohibit that act. The ordinary task of the courts is to rely on well-established public policy chiefs and apply them to different situations. For example, A, the CEO of a company, agrees to award a contract to B if the latter pays rs 5,000 to the former.
The agreement tends to create an interest against bonds and is non-hazard because of the trade in public functions.