Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a traitor.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a traitor.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s has a secular progressive and anti-Constitution philosophy. . .

The basis of her sex is used to hide the facts behind the treasonous overt acts that live within Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Her actions are far from a heroic fight for women’s rights, it’s a bizarre concoction of radical feminist angst and ideology that ignores originalist interpretations of the Constitution in favor of reliance on international law, foreign court decisions, and a flagrantly political agenda.

We need only look at her 230-page book, called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, to see elements of her radical philosophy:

    The purpose of this book was to show how the proposed Equal Rights Amendment (for which she was an aggressive advocate) would change federal laws to make them sex-neutral and “eliminate sex-discriminatory provisions.”

    Ginsburg called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)[.] …

    Ginsburg called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)

    She asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)

    She objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97) …

    Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)

Ginsburg is no fan of President Trump, which is why she refuses to retire, but is a fan of bypassing the U.S. Constitution. If we needed another reminder of why it matters who is elected president and who gets to pick not only the replacement for Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg reminds us. In statements to CNN and the New York Times during the 2016 presidential election, Ginsburg called the presumptive GOP presidential nominee a “faker” and warned of the danger of a Trump administration to SCOTUS and the country. As ABC News reported:

    “He is a faker,” Ginsburg said of Trump on Monday on CNN. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego[.] … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.”

    She also told the New York Times that a Trump presidency would be unimaginable for the country and the Supreme Court.

    “I can’t imagine what this place would be – I can’t imagine what the country would be with Donald Trump as our president,” she told the Times. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be – I don’t even want to contemplate that.”

    She jokingly added that she would move to New Zealand if he were to win the election in November.

She is entitled to her own political views. She is entitled even to use them in forming her court decisions. She is not entitled to use her lifetime appointment to attempt to sway Americans in an election. Her remarks show how far liberals on the Supreme Court and in lower courts have gone beyond interpreting the intent of the Founders in writing the Constitution to using the Supreme Court to advance a political and social agenda. To them, the Constitution is a “living document” written in the sand, not carved into the bedrock of American democracy.

She is one of the justices who advocates incorporating foreign law and foreign constitutions into SCOTUS decisions:

    At the beginning of February, Ruth Bader Ginsburg traveled to South Africa, where she gave a public address on “The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication.” She defended the Supreme Court’s recent practice of taking guidance from foreign law when interpreting the U.S. Constitution. She acknowledged that the practice has been criticized. She expressed concern at bills before Congress condemning the practice.

In that speech in South Africa, Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued that if judges can consult law review articles and such in the U.S., “why not the analysis of a question similar to the one we confront contained in an opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Constitutional Court of South Africa, the German Constitutional Court, or the European Court of Human Rights?”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in a concurring opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger, affirmed the use of racial preferences in university admissions, citing the fact that the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination temporarily allows for the “maintenance of unequal or separate rights for different racial groups.” Separate but equal?

Justice Ginsburg shares the view that the Supreme Court is a tool – not for ruling on the law and the Constitution, as the Founders intended, but for social engineering, incorporating foreign laws and opinions. She is a globalist who believes that “we the people” includes the people of Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka. She believes in a “living Constitution” as an Etch-a-Sketch document that can mean, as in Alice in Wonderland, whatever she chooses it to mean.

She is the poster child for judicial activism and legislating from the bench. Therein, she is a traitor.


Stephanie Agli Gallagher

Stephanie Agli Gallagher is a traitor.

Stephanie Agli Gallagher is a traitor.

Stephanie Agli Gallagher is a treasonous corrupt United States Magistrate Judge in the District of Maryland.

Judge Gallagher unlawfully issued a search warrant that allowed the FBI to raid the home of a patriotic whistleblower who had already turned over documents regarding the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One. The raid was an “outrageous disregard” of whistleblower protections.

The whistleblower, Dennis “Nate” Nathan Cain, had previously turned the documents over to the Department of Justice’s inspector general and both the House and Senate Intelligence committees.

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.

Nevertheless, Judge Gallagher unlawfully collaborated with the FBI to illegally raid and rummage through Cain’s home for six hours, even after knowing the whistleblower had already turned over the documents in full compliance with the law.

Prior to her appointment as a United States Magistrate Judge on the District of Maryland in 2011, Stephanie Gallagher was a partner and co-founder of Levin & Gallagher, LLC, where she practiced white-collar defense litigation. In other words, she defended white-collar criminals – by definition is referring to nonviolent, financially and motivated crime committed by business and government professionals.

Taking the above into account, it’s not hard to see who’s bed she still sleeps in. Especially nowadays when it’s overly apparent that no bad deed goes unrewarded within the United States Government. This is sadly another example of that, for the traitor Stephanie Agli Gallagher is currently a nominee in becoming a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

NOTE: Please take a minute or two and contact your senator and let he or she know you do not want Stephanie Agli Gallagher appointed from a United States Magistrate Judge to a United States District Judge.

CLICK HERE to contact your United States Senator.

Please don’t wait, for the Senate will vote on her nomination in the near future.

CLICK HERE to read about the patriotic whistleblower, Dennis “Nate” Nathan Cain.


W. Joseph Astarita

W. Joseph Astarita is a traitor.

W. Joseph Astarita is a traitor.

W. Joseph Astarita is a treasonous Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agent. He was indicted on five felony charges after the inspector general of the U.S. Justice Department last year began investigating possible FBI criminal misconduct and whether there was a cover-up.

Astarita said nothing during a brief court hearing and was released on his own recognizance, declining to comment as he left.

“The actions of the FBI HRT (Hostage Rescue Team) in this case damage the integrity of the entire law enforcement profession, which makes me both disappointed and angry,” said Deschutes County Sheriff Shane Nelson, whose department investigated Finicum’s shooting.

Oregon U.S. Attorney Billy Williams would neither confirm nor deny that up to four additional members of the FBI team are under investigation for making false statements.

Asked why Astarita may have lied, Williams said: “I suspect that question will be answered in court.”

The FBI spokeswoman in Portland, Jennifer Adams, referred questions to headquarters in Washington, D.C., which did not return messages seeking comment.

A grand jury indicted Astarita on making false statements to his FBI supervisors just after the shooting and obstruction of justice for misleading the Oregon State Police.

A one-week jury trial is set for August 29, 2018. The obstruction charge carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, while making a false statement could bring five years.

Finicum’s widow, Jeanette Finicum, has said she plans to sue state police and the FBI, alleging the use of excessive force in her husband’s death.

Dozens of people, including leader Ammon Bundy, occupied the remote Malheur National Wildlife Refuge from Jan. 2 to Feb. 11, 2016. They were allowed to come and go for several weeks as authorities acted like they were trying to avoid bloodshed as seen in past standoffs at Waco, Texas, and Ruby Ridge, Idaho.

But authorities moved in January 26, 2016 when key standoff leaders left for a prearranged community meeting with government elected officials. The FBI was informed of this beforehand, and knew none of the standoff leaders and their passengers were armed before pulling over their two vehicles.

Finicum, 54, was driving one vehicle. Video taken by a passenger showed the occupants panicking after authorities stopped the truck.

Finicum then sped off, coming to a roadblock and plowing into a snowbank.

Authorities say FBI agent Astarita fired two errant shots as Finicum left the truck. As Finicum then stood in the snow, two Oregon state troopers fired three rounds that hit him.

It should be further noted that no hostage situation was ever involved, but the FBI sent in the (HRT) Hostage Rescue Team with this blood trusty traitor acting in his official opacity as a sniper. By the authorities own words, FBI agent Astarita fired two ‘errant’ shots as Finicum left the truck. By definition these shots were lawless and criminal, and still Astarita has never been charged with anything near the crime of attempted murder.


Additional Information from July 10, 2017

The FBI agent indicted for allegedly lying about a pivotal moment during the 2016 Malheur National Wildlife Refuge occupation has hired a high-profile Washington D.C.-based attorney to defend him.

Indicted FBI Hostage Rescue Team member W. Joseph Astarita has retained Robert Cary.

Cary will serve as co-counsel in the Astarita case with Portland based attorneys David Angeli and Tyler Francis.

Federal prosecutors have accused Astarita of lying to investigators about firing his gun during a traffic stop that left Malhuer occupation leader Robert “LaVoy” Finicum dead.

Though neither of Astarita’s shots hit Finicum, prosecutors have charged the FBI agent with several felonies for allegedly failing to disclose them. Those charges include making false statements and obstruction of justice, but don’t include attempted murder or his criminal involvement in the murder assignation of Robert “LaVoy” Finicum.

The FBI said Astarita is working in an “administrative capacity” with the agency, but has declined to discuss any additional details about the case. In other words, can you say protecting their own and government coverup? Well we can, especially right from the start when everyone of the FBI agents didn’t wear their body cameras along with informing the Oregon State Police officers to do the same.


Additional Information from July 16, 2018

U.S. District Judge Robert E. Jones threw out two of the five charges against FBI agent W. Joseph Astarita accused of covering up that he fired two rifle shots at the truck of Oregon refuge occupation spokesman Robert “LaVoy” Finicum at a roadblock in January 2016.

Judge Jones struck one count of making a false statement and one count of obstruction of justice against W. Joseph Astarita.

The agent still faces three charges before his trial is scheduled to start: two other counts of making a false statement and one other count of obstruction of justice.


Additional Information: August 9, 2018

At trial, Astarita, 41, is accused of two counts of making a false statement, alleging he lied to his immediate FBI supervisor “B.M.” at the scene and days later to FBI supervisor Tim Swanson when he told them he hadn’t shot his rifle. He also faces one count of obstruction of justice during his initial interview with two state police detectives.

During the trial an investigators said, One shot struck the roof of the truck and the other went astray as Finicum stepped out of his truck, his hands in the air.

The prosecutor stressed the need to critically examine the actions of law enforcement officers who maintain positions of trust in the community and the importance of holding an FBI agent accountable for straying from the bureau’s motto of “fidelity, bravery, integrity.”

Maloney argued that Astarita was the only officer who was standing in the spot where the bullet that struck Finicum’s roof could have come from, based on government expert Michael Haag’s analysis of the bullet’s path.

Astarita, who took the stand denied firing his weapon during the incident — or recalling much of anything about where he had been positioned at the scene.

Maloney urged jurors to review FBI aerial video that captured Astarita’s stance with his rifle shouldered, pointing at Finicum’s truck as he stood beside the open passenger door of a state police pickup in the middle of the roadblock, at the time the two disputed shots were fired. However on the other hand, Maloney went so far as to make the jury themselves feel guilty if they convicted Astarita by saying, “It’s with no pleasure or glee, and it’s with a heavy heart that the U.S. government has to ask you to convict one of its brightest stars. . .”


Additional Information: August 10, 2018

The jury acquitted W. Joseph Astarita.

This verdict comes at no surprise, for thanks to a corrupt federal judicial system the charges were for two fired shots, one bullet hole and a crime scene free of evidence which included the bullet casings. If that isn’t enough, Joseph Astarita was the only federal or state officer charged for committing any form of crime involving what is clearly a case of attempted murder that ended in the murder assignation of Robert LaVoy Finicum.


Additional Information

CLICK HERE to read about Lavoy Finicum and how he was murdered.

CLICK HERE to read about the Oregon State Police (OSP) officer that murdered LaVoy Finicum.


Casey Codding

Casey Codding is a traitor.

Casey Codding is a traitor.

Casey Codding murdered Lavoy Finicum.

Thanks to recent testimony we know the activist’s death was a pre-planned assassination. But corrupt judges along with government officials have sealed the identity of the Oregon State Police (OSP) Officer directly responsible for the murder of Lavoy Finicum.

Despite public outcry, trials against protestors and even charges against one of the FBI agents for the filing of a false report in the murder, the man who pulled the trigger has been known only as Officer #1.

However, today someone leaked the name of the OSP officer behind the slaying. The real name of officer #1 is CASEY CODDING (a/k/a – Casey Michael Codding), and this is a photo of him.

Casey is not denying the killing, and he is being praised by other government traitors for his actions. In fact he is being praised as a hero for helping the FBI and other OSP officers setup an illegal roadblock to ambush and kill the activist Lavoy Finicum.

We should never forget Casey Codding (a/k/a – Casey Michael Codding):

    He killed 3 people…

    He fired rounds into a moving vehicle…

    He fired 2 rounds into the back of a man…

    He is the man that murdered Lavoy Finicum.

If that isn’t enough to turn one’s stomach, then this might,. . . Casey has since been promoted to the rank of captain.

As members of the human race we should all demand that Casey Codding answer for his crimes and be given the due process he and his treasonous friends have denied Lavoy Finicum.

Furthermore. it’s time we stop and put an end to these unlawful fake courts and their secret trails, for ‘We The People’ have the right to know the names and faces of the criminals that violate our highest laws and murder our families.


Additional Information

CLICK HERE to read about Lavoy Finicum and how he was murdered.

CLICK HERE to read about the FBI agent who lied about firing two rifle shots at the truck of Lavoy Finicum.


Robert S. Lasnik

Robert S. Lasnik is a traitor.

Robert S. Lasnik is a traitor.

Robert S. Lasnik is a treasonous Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik on Tuesday (July 31, 2018) blocked the imminent release of blueprints for 3-D printed guns, hours before they were set to hit the internet.

The decision blocked a settlement President Donald Trump’s administration had reached with the Texas-based company, which planned to put files online on Wednesday.

Eight states and the District of Columbia on Monday filed a lawsuit to fight a June settlement between the federal government and Defense Distributed allowing the Texas-based company to legally publish its designs.

Judge Robert Lasnik is clearly a traitor, for he has no legal authority to issue such an unlawful court order in violation to the First and Second Amendments of the United States Constitution.


UPDATE: August 2, 2018

Despite Judge Robert Lasnik’s treasonous ruling, NBC News reported on Code Is Free Speech, a coalition of five West Coast gun rights groups, posted the plans, claiming the publication was protected on First Amendment free speech grounds.


Additional Information

Plastic guns are created in the same manner as anything that is printed in 3-D: The machine stacks layers of material to form an object. But guns made by 3-D printers have a particular risk factor — they’re untraceable.

Back in 2013, Defense Distributed founder Cody Wilson posted a video of him firing the Liberator — all plastic and 3-D-printed, save for a metal firing pin — and uploaded the plans online. According to CNN, he was served with a cease-and-desist order from the U.S. State Department a few days later; the State Department argued that Wilson’s plans may have violated International Traffic in Arms Regulations because he released the information to people outside the U.S. To this we must ask, “When did international law override the highest law in the land – The United States Constitution?”

In June 2018, Wilson came to a settlement with the Trump administration that implied he would be able to post his plans, according to The Verge.

According to the Orlando Sentinel, Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) tried to pass last-minute legislation blocking the publication, saying, “American national security is going to be irreversibly weakened because of the actions of the administration.” His effort was blocked by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), who raised First Amendment concerns, according to the Sentinel.

A lawyer for Wilson criticized the restraining order as a violation of his First Amendment rights. According to NBC News, Defense Distributed was not responsible for the publication and had agreed not to post the documents, pending court rulings.