In addition, the order of authors may be reviewed if the actual contributions of individuals differ significantly from the contributions expected at the beginning of the project. This situation can arise when an author assumes increased responsibility or delegates some of his responsibilities to other authors. Open and fluid communication in this process is the key to developing a respectful and professional research environment. Since author negotiation is often an ongoing discussion, efforts can be made during a project to minimize the possibility of developing differences of opinion and identifying and resolving disagreements before they escalate. Discussion of the author at regular intervals or at important stages in the project can help minimize the potential for the development of a disagreement later in the project. Osborne, J. W., &Holland, A. (2009). What is the author and what should it be? An overview of important guidelines for determining the author in scientific publications. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(15), 1-19. As a PhD student, it may at first seem daunting to discuss the roles you want or expect, and your place as a contributing author in a project.
However, this step should be approached as a means of learning that contributes to your professional identity as a researcher and scientist. Consultants will generally be happy to talk about the author and consider these discussions as an important aspect of the mentor-mente relationship. Grobman, L. (2009). The student: (Re) negotiation of authority and authority. College Composition and Communication, 61 years old, 175-196. We offer two model author agreements, one for magazines and the other for academic sites of departments and units. It is useful for everyone to see that the original author and the order of the authors may change during the development of the project, in order to better reflect the actual contributions of all researchers. There are many reasons to change authors, many of which may be specific to the situation. Amendments should be decided by mutual agreement, taking into account each other`s perspective and considering each other`s contributions. Since psychological research has become increasingly interdisciplinary, it is also important to recognize that other fields may have different author cultures (e.g.B the lead researcher could be the first or last author).
Leonard, L. (2010). Author Negotiation for Thesis Publications: An Answer. Quality Health Research, 20 (5), 723-726. Fine, M. A. & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflection on the determination of authors` credits and the order of authors in the cooperation between the faculty and the students.
American psychologist, 48 years old, 11 years old, 1141-1147. Nevertheless, situations may arise during this process, which can lead to misunderstandings or quarrels of authors. If they do occur, those who contributed to the project should first discuss the disagreements, possibly using contracts or scorecards like the ones mentioned above. Everyone involved in the project should participate openly and professionally in these discussions…